You are here

Democratic Performance by House District

The data below was pulled from the NC Board of Elections. The chart is color-coded to indicate how Republican- or Democrat-leaning each NCGA House District is. Each value is an indication of the difference in the percentage of votes received by the Democratic candidate in the as compared to their Republican opponent. For more information, read our blog post on decoding data.

Breakdowns of Democratic performance by NCGA House District. Click headers to sort.
District Performance Democratic Performance Average in 2012 Gerrymander Rating
hd1 leangop, 2 -11.90 11.90
hd2 competitive, 3 2.72 2.72
hd3 leangop, 2 -10.00 10.00
hd4 solidgop, 1 -18.13 18.13
hd5 soliddem, 5 40.64 40.64
hd6 competitive, 3 -4.90 4.90
hd7 soliddem 27.59 27.59
hd8 competitive, 3 -3.11 3.11
hd9 competitive -7.59 7.59
hd10 solidgop -25.04 25.04
hd11 soliddem 25.11 25.11
hd12 soliddem 20.32 20.32
hd13 solidgop -32.33 32.33
hd14 solidgop -15.37 15.37
hd15 solidgop -24.02 24.02
hd16 solidgop -22.42 22.42
hd17 solidgop -24.01 24.01
hd18 soliddem 25.46 25.46
hd19 solidgop -17.38 17.38
hd20 solidgop -19.94 19.94
hd21 soliddem 35.13 35.13
hd22 competitive -1.57 1.57
hd23 soliddem 35.26 35.26
hd24 soliddem 51.11 51.11
hd25 solidgop, 1 -15.24 15.24
hd26 solidgop -15.49 15.49
hd27 soliddem 40.73 40.73
hd28 solidgop -24.78 24.78
hd29 soliddem 69.32 69.32
hd30 soliddem 41.89 41.89
hd31 soliddem 64.84 64.84
hd32 soliddem 37.88 37.88
hd33 soliddem 62.26 62.26
hd34 soliddem 27.73 27.73
hd35 competitive, 3 -7.74 7.74
hd36 competitive, 3 -7.48 7.48
hd37 leangop -10.89 10.89
hd38 soliddem, 5 57.56 57.56
hd39 soliddem, 5 17.80 17.80
hd40 competitive, 3 -6.07 6.07
hd41 competitive, 3 0.55 0.55
hd42 soliddem, 5 47.11 47.11
hd43 soliddem, 5 37.98 37.98
hd44 leandem, 4 9.12 9.12
hd45 competitive, 3 -5.87 5.87
hd46 competitive, 3 6.16 6.16
hd47 soliddem, 5 37.20 37.20
hd48 soliddem, 5 45.99 45.99
hd49 competitive, 3 -1.35 1.35
hd50 soliddem, 5 17.35 17.35
hd51 leangop, 2 -9.61 9.61
hd52 solidgop, 1 -23.91 23.91
hd53 leangop, 2 -10.03 10.03
hd54 leandem, 4 9.63 9.63
hd55 leangop, 2 -13.10 13.10
hd56 soliddem, 5 51.81 51.81
hd57 soliddem, 5 47.46 47.46
hd58 soliddem, 5 54.83 54.83
hd59 solidgop, 1 -17.43 17.43
hd60 soliddem, 5 56.66 56.66
hd61 solidgop, 1 -16.60 16.60
hd62 solidgop, 1 -14.20 14.20
hd63 leangop, 2 -8.65 8.65
hd64 leangop, 2 -13.32 13.32
hd65 solidgop, 1 -14.26 14.26
hd66 leandem, 4 12.79 12.79
hd67 solidgop, 1 -28.16 28.16
hd68 solidgop, 1 -28.71 28.71
hd69 solidgop, 1 -26.25 26.25
hd70 solidgop, 1 -44.31 44.31
hd71 soliddem, 5 46.81 46.81
hd72 soliddem, 5 42.01 42.01
hd73 solidgop, 1 -42.47 42.47
hd74 solidgop, 1 -19.83 19.83
hd75 solidgop, 1 -14.34 14.34
hd76 solidgop, 1 -30.53 30.53
hd77 solidgop, 1 -21.31 21.31
hd78 solidgop, 1 -46.67 46.67
hd79 solidgop, 1 -31.36 31.36
hd80 solidgop, 1 -42.88 42.88
hd81 solidgop, 1 -30.57 30.57
hd82 solidgop, 1 -15.54 15.54
hd83 solidgop, 1 -16.41 16.41
hd84 solidgop, 1 -25.21 25.21
hd85 solidgop, 1 -35.92 35.92
hd86 solidgop -17.91 17.91
hd87 solidgop -31.98 31.98
hd88 leangop -11.44 11.44
hd89 solidgop -31.89 31.89
hd90 solidgop -29.45 29.45
hd91 solidgop -22.73 22.73
hd92 competitive 3.14 3.14
hd93 leangop -9.66 9.66
hd94 solidgop -33.99 33.99
hd95 solidgop -31.17 31.17
hd96 solidgop -25.53 25.53
hd97 solidgop -35.66 35.66
hd98 solidgop -16.54 16.54
hd99 soliddem 62.83 62.83
hd100 soliddem 45.20 45.20
hd101 soliddem 48.83 48.83
hd102 soliddem 64.47 64.47
hd103 leangop -11.88 11.88
hd104 solidgop -15.40 15.40
hd105 solidgop -18.60 18.60
hd106 soliddem 69.86 69.86
hd107 soliddem 58.39 58.39
hd108 solidgop -21.14 21.14
hd109 solidgop -16.09 16.09
hd110 solidgop -22.73 22.73
hd111 solidgop -18.92 18.92
hd112 solidgop -22.43 22.43
hd113 solidgop -21.22 21.22
hd114 soliddem 47.42 47.42
hd115 competitive -1.14 1.14
hd116 leangop -10.16 10.16
hd117 solidgop -24.75 24.75
hd118 leangop, 2 -9.92 9.92
hd119 competitive 1.96 1.96
hd120 solidgop -28.96 28.96